« FTP Server | Main | Everything we know about women »

April 28, 2005

Digital RAW Image Controversy

Recently, Thomas Knoll of Adobe accused Nikon of encrypting the white balance information in the RAW image file for the D2X and D2Hs cameras. In doing so, a controversy that had been smoldering for some time erupted into a firestorm.

The problem of RAW proprietary formats is a very real problem that is on a path to becoming the Achilles' heel of digital photography. Non-compatible RAW image formats will unnecessarily cripple the explosive growth of the photographic community. Camera manufactures believe that they have a vested interest in encrypting their files as Joel Sposky explains here.

Glenn Reynolds, at Instapundit, suggests that it may be a 'Tempest in a teapot'.

Dave Coffin, the uncontested guru of RAW image file formats has successfully created conversion programs, including dcraw.c, that convert proprietary RAW formats for many digital cameras to a general RAW Portable Pixel Map(PPM) format. He suggests that there's nothing all that new or challenging in Nikon's encryption.

I respectfully suggest that Glenn Reynolds is off base in his characterization of this controversy. I further suggest that Dave Coffin has underestimated the nature and resolve of his adversaries.

Although it's true that the various camera manufactures have practiced data compression and encryption of various types for some time, and it may be hard to imagine Nikon's white balance encryption as an Orwellian exercise, the camera manufacturers, collectively, are clearly on a divergent paths in relation to their RAW image formats.

Although the camera manufactures have, so far, given Dave Coffin a pass and turned a blind eye while he hacked their proprietary formats, it doesn't take a genius to figure out that 1) they don't like what he's doing and 2) they're going to try to stop him by any means available.

You can bet your bottom dollar that the camera manufacturers are currently in the process of a) making their file formats virtually impossible to crack and b) preparing a lawsuit against Dave Coffin under the DMCA to stop him from 'illegally' cracking their proprietary file formats.

Why does it matter? It matters because the proprietary RAW file formats limit the pictures' value. I own a Canon EOS 20D, and I don't shoot RAW images. The reason is because a) I can't see a file preview in Windows Explorer and b) I couldn't open the files in Adobe Photoshop or Photoshop Elements and c)I don't like Canon's software for working with RAW images. So, I've got three grand tied up in this camera, and I go around shooting .jpg files because, although the images are compressed, they're MUCH easier to work with. The .jpg file format is one of the most widely accepted picture formats, and almost any photo software can open the file.

It's true that, about six months after I bought my EOS 20D, Adobe Photoshop released a plugin that allowed Photoshop to open my EOS20D RAW images, but by then, I had just decided to quit shooting raw images.

This is no tempest in a teacup. This is a real problem that presents a clear and present danger to the photographic community at large. Unless the photographic community unequivocally demands an open source RAW format, the end result will quite possibly be that images taken on Canon's cameras can only be edited and viewed with Canon software and swarms of RIAA inspired attorneys will search the internet in perpetuity, suing hapless photographers over cracked RAW file formats.

Posted by Peenie Wallie on April 28, 2005 at 4:05 PM

Comments

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)


NOTICE: IT WILL TAKE APPROX 1-2 MINS FOR YOUR COMMENT TO POST SUCCESSFULLY. YOU WILL HAVE TO REFRESH YOUR BROWSER. PLEASE DO NOT DOUBLE POST COMMENTS OR I WILL KILL YOU.